Czaplicki: Contact Dermatitis From Eriodictyon parryi: Armed with sticky, glandular hairs coated with
irritating prenylated phenolics, contact with the poodle-
dog bush causes a blistering rash in a manner similar to
plants of the Toxicodendron genus.
[Wikipedia] Description, Taxonomy, Skin Irritant: Eriodictyon parryi or poodle-dog bush is a tall California mountain shrub with showy purple flowers, which is notable for secreting a severe skin irritant. It is an opportunistic species that grows mostly in areas that have been disturbed by fire. In a dry early spring in Southern California, its semi-dormant leaves can droop and curl into coils like locks of curly hair, hence the popular name based on the metaphor of a poodle's natural hair.
Taxonomy
When first described by Asa Gray, the poodle-dog bush was placed within the genus Nama. It was subsequently moved to a monotypic genus Turricula (having the same name as a genus of sea snails). Molecular phylogenetic analysis carried out by Ferguson (1998) supports treating Turricula as a separate genus within a clade (Ferguson does not use the term "subfamily") that includes Eriodictyon, and also the genera Nama and Wigandia. However, other molecular data support placing the plant in Eriodictyon.[7]
Skin irritant
Like many species in the forget-me-not family, poodle-dog bush causes severe irritation if touched, akin to poison oak. It can raise blisters lasting as long as several weeks. There may be a delay of several days before the reaction starts. The hairs stick to skin and clothing.[8] The allergic contact dermatitis is due to prenylated phenolics exuded by hairs (glandular trichomes) of the plant.[9] The principal irritants are derivatives of farnesyl hydroquinone and 3-farnesyl-P-hydroxybenzoic acid. Once the immune system has been sensitized to the irritant, later exposure can cause a memory response, in which previously exposed areas erupt even though they were not exposed the second time.
Native Americans used the plant medicinally: Zigmond (1981, p. 68) reports that the Kawaiisu people used an infusion of the leaves to relieve swellings or rheumatism, and Sparkman (1908, p. 230) also reports that the Luiseņo people (who knew it as Atovikut) used it medicinally, though he does not specify for what purpose. No clinical trials have been undertaken to support the efficacy of the plant for these clinical conditions, and there is no reliable evidence that it can be used for any type of treatment. (link added by Mary Ann Machi)
/app/up/entry/306/th/91876.jpg:!/app/up/entry/123/th/36967.jpg:!/app/up/gp/85/th/17183.jpg?a:!/app/up/entry/95/th/28738.jpg:!/app/up/entry/123/th/36969.jpg:!/app/up/io/39/th/11822.jpg:!/app/up/entry/123/th/36970.jpg:!/app/up/entry/123/th/36968.jpg:!/app/up/entry/168/th/50465.jpg:!0000 0000 0103 0089:!/app/up/entry/95/th/28751.jpg?a:!/app/up/entry/90/th/27040.jpg:!/app/up/entry/691/th/207397.jpg?a:!/app/up/entry/64/th/19393.jpg:!/app/up/entry/318/th/95431.jpg:!/app/up/entry/168/th/50463.jpg:!0000 0000 0104 0511:!
2019 Wendy Walker:!2019 Bryant Baker:!2019 Matt Berger:!2019 Debbie Shaw:!2019 Bryant Baker:!2017 Aaron Echols:!2019 Bryant Baker:!2019 Bryant Baker:!2020 Ron Vanderhoff:!2002 Hartmut Wisch:!2019 Debbie Shaw:!2019 Bryant Baker:!2024 Martin Schenker:!2018 Alan Prichard:!2021 Amber Bedgood:!2020 Ron Vanderhoff:!2004 Aaron Schusteff:!
mu15810:!po148813:!gp17183:!po133993:!po148813:!po41422:!po148813:!po148813:!mu4316:!null:!po133993:!po130836:!po265045:!po94142:!mu16732:!mu4316:!null:!
Suggested Citation
Calflora:
Information on California plants for education, research and conservation,
with data contributed by
public and private institutions and individuals.
[web application]. 2024. Berkeley, California:The Calflora Database
[a non-profit organization].Available:
https://www.calflora.org/(Accessed: 11/21/2024).